|
BEST EVIDENCE ON CHEMTRAILS: DISCOVERY CHANNEL Barium and
aluminum are just two of the dangerous toxins that make up the
chemtrail mix, prominent chemtrail researchers Rosalind Peterson (http://www.californiaskywatch.com)
and Will Thomas (http://www.willthomas.net)
report on in the documentary aired in the U.S. on Feb. 22, 2007. Best
Evidence, a Toronto-based film group, also presents a number of NASA,
NOAA and other U.S. government-related scientists and geo-engineers
who either deny the existence of chemtrails (vs. contrails), or say
that they’re crucial in “stopping global warming.” The program devotes
about half of its time to chasing a red herring, that chemtrail
additives are being slipped into commercial jet fuel tanks. Thanks to
Brian Holmes for alerting us to the film. VIDEO LINK:
http://www.holmestead.ca/chemtrails/discovery.html
Best Evidence’s documentary film on chemtrails is a valuable
breakthrough. It’s no easy task to produce a program on such a
carefully guarded topic and getting scientists from NOAA and NASA to
sit down for an interview, and then manage to present it over cable
television. Just airing the program enables people to actually look at
the skies, for starters.
Chemtrail researcher Rosalind Peterson is given time to say the
comprehensive spraying – of barium, aluminum and other toxic metals
and molds - has to do “with military operations…secret government
weather modification programs.”
Veteran journalist and chemtrail researcher Will Thomas is filmed
saying that the particles sprayed are in the 10-micron range (a human
hair is 100 microns) and invisible to the naked eye.
The program more or less assumes that chemtrails are distinct from
contrails (though it gives voice to NASA and NOAA scientists who say
“there’s no evidence of chemtrails” and that “the idea is just
ludicrous”.
The program pits the three independent observers (Peterson, Thomas and
Dickie) against eight U.S. government-connected engineers, scientists
and EPA-linked corporate executives:
CIRRUS CLOUDS (& CHEMTRAILS) CONTRIBUTE TO ‘GLOBAL WARMING’
Atmospheric scientist Dr. Wayne Evans says that clouds reflect more
sunlight back into space than they supply infrared heat back to
earth.” Cirrus clouds, though, are different. “They actually radiate
more heat energy than they reflect solar energy back into space. And
therefore cirrus clouds contribute to global warming.” Dr. Evans
explains that “contrails” become cirrus clouds, and therefore
contrails contribute to global warming.
Wayne’s observation echoes 1996 U.K. study by the Scientists for
Global Responsibility that says “the dangerous geo-engineering
proposed by [Edward] Teller et al. would have would be absolutely
ineffective in mitigating global warming for it would have the
opposite effect!” The report noted further that this climate
engineering research was funded by industries with vested interests in
the continued high consumption of fossil fuels.”
THE NOTION OF CHEMTRAILS IS JUST LUDICROUS, THERE’S NO EVIDENCE
NASA senior scientist Patrick Minnis at Langley Research Center says
“The notion of chemtrails is just ludicrous. I’ve heard many ideas of
why these contrails are called chemtrails and the reasons why they
would be occurring and no one seems to agree on anything except that
they’re not contrails. They don’t really have an explanation of what
they are and they’re not willing really to look at the simplest
explanation, that they’re contrails.”
INADVERTENT WEATHER MOD
Next Dr. Joseph Golden, NOAA “weather modification pioneer” is brought
on to refute chemtrails: “No matter what we do, there are people who
are convinced that something secretive is going on…There’s no evidence
of chemtrails.” Golden was a member of StormFury (1962-1983) program
that was finally shut down due to litigation from many victims of the
artificially induced and re-directed hurricanes. If there’s any
weather modification going on from contrails, Golden says, it’s
inadvertent.
WE’RE CERTAINLY NOT GOING TO DO ANYTHING
THAT MIGHT ENDANGER THE CLIMATE SYSTEM
Dr. Tom Wigley, senior scientist with the National Center for
Atmospheric Research, tells Best Evidence, “We’re certainly not going
to do anything that might endanger the climate system.” He then avers
that geoengineering is a strategy to combat global warming:
“Geo-engineering has been around for a number of decades but because
the climate system is changing more rapidly than we expected, then
we’re resurrecting the idea and considering it more seriously.”
WE NEED TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF EVERYBODY ON THIS PLANET
You will notice that the television documentary, following the lead of
our cryptocratic government, switches gears. Wigley, along with those
at Lawrence Livermore Labs, is an advocate of Aerial Obscuration.
EPA-connected Weather modification entrepreneur Alvia Gaskill Jr. says
“We don’t have a hundred years. We have maybe 20 years before we start
seeing some of the serious effects of climate change…If we’re not
going to be able to come up with replacement technologies in time,
we’re not going to be able to regulate emissions in time, we’re really
left with taking these other, other extraordinary means….We need to
take advantage of everybody on this planet to help solve the problem
of global warming. If we can do it with some form of climate
engineering, all the better.”
GLOBAL WARMING
Geoengineering will be accepted when Global Warming is established as
fact in the public mind (the collective cognitive imperative, as
Julian Jaynes has it). Gaskill Jr.’s Straussian neo-con contempt for
the public, coupled with his freaked-out claim of Global Frying in 20
years, is reason enough reason for a climate engineering program.
CATASTROPHIC GLOBAL WARMING
Will Thomas says chemtrail spraying is part of “a deliberate project
to slow down catastrophic global warming.” Though Thomas, unlike
Gaskill, apparently, thinks the program is ‘reckless’.
EMBEDDING COLLECTIVE COGNITIVE IMPERATIVES
So, you see, “global warming” is imbedded in the chemtrail
documentary. Global warming is the collective cognitive imperative for
North America and Europe: http://activistteacher.blogspot.com/2007/02/global-warming-truth-or-dare.html
As Thomas says, the government (our rulers/the military) are going to
go public with their chemtrail program, justified by the manufactured
global warming crisis. It will, no doubt, exonerate the government and
complicit corporations for collateral damage or “unintended”
consequences.
As for the rest of the Discovery Channel-approved program, it’s filler
of a red herring variety.
BEST EVIDENCE OR A RED HERRING?
The narrator intones, “Only the chemtrails believers claim that secret
additives in jet fuel are being used in weather modification
experiments…People who research chemtrails are convinced there’s a
conspiracy underway to change the weather…[they] have one key burden
of proof working against their case. They have no means of capturing
the chemical content they claim is so harmful to humans and the
environment. The challenge for Best Evidence will be to devise a
number of experiments to do just that.”
The television program then turns to a protracted experiment conducted
by scientists at Kettering University, formerly General Motors
University (name changed in 1998) which conducts test on fuel obtained
from commercial jets. It tests negative for aluminum and sulfur.
Nothing said about barium.
Best Evidence nicely admitted that they didn’t really examine the best
evidence. The U.S. Air Force refused to have its fuel tested, so the
elaborate test was almost totally irrelevant. And nothing at all was
said about sprays being dispersed through external tanks as opposed to
distribution through fuels.
As Will Thomas says in the documentary, the U.S. government in late
2005 established a federal bureau of weather modification as a rubric
to “come out and admit to a chemtrail-type project.”
It would be of great interest to see Best Evidence (and Discovery
Channel) examine the best evidence for global warming. Among those
they might interview are climatologist Dr. Timothy Ball http://www.holmestead.ca/chemtrails/warming.html
and University of Ottawa physicist Denis G. Rancourt: http://activistteacher.blogspot.com/2007/02/global-warming-truth-or-dare.html.
Filmmakers’ Notebook # 128
yor yevrah, snowshoefilms, March 11, 2007.
|
 |
